Industries We Serve

Compliance shaped by the risks your sector actually faces.

A payments firm, a broker and an estate agent all sit under the same recommendations, and all three get inspected against completely different expectations. TitanAxe maps the modules, the data and the evidence trail to the obligations that apply to you, not to a generic AML checklist.

Request a Demo See your sector

Serving regulated organisations across the United States, the United Kingdom, the Gulf and beyond.

Core sectors served
4 sectors, each with its own control map
Screening coverage
150+ jurisdictions
Country risk data
195+ countries in TitanRadar
Detection library
350+ AML and fraud rules
01

Financial Institutions

Fully customised Financial Crime & Regulatory compliance solutions for Financial Institutions to prevent and detect financial crime and comply with prevailing laws and regulations.

  • Electronic Money Institutions (EMIs)
  • Payment Service Providers (PSPs)
  • Financial Technology Company (FinTech)
  • Foreign Exchange & Remittance Institutions

Where the pressure sits

  • Sophisticated Identity Fraud:  Criminals are using advanced AI tools like deepfakes and high-quality fake documents to bypass traditional Know Your Customer (KYC) checks during remote onboarding.
  • Balancing Speed and Compliance:  Institutions must balance customer demand for fast, seamless digital onboarding experiences with the need for robust, multi-layered due diligence to meet strict regulatory requirements (e.g., identifying Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) in complex corporate structures).
  • Data Management and Integration:  Managing vast amounts of data from different sources and integrating new digital asset solutions with outdated legacy systems creates bottlenecks and data governance issues.
  • Customer Churn:  Slow, manual, and complex onboarding processes lead to high customer abandonment rates, resulting in significant business losses and internal friction.
  • High False Positive Rates:  Traditional rule-based systems generate an overwhelming number of false positives, which drains compliance teams' resources as they investigate legitimate transactions.
  • Real-time and Cross-channel Complexity:  The ubiquity of instant payments and the rise of digital assets (including cryptocurrencies and DeFi platforms) require real-time, cross-channel monitoring, which is difficult with siloed, legacy systems.
  • Evolving Criminal Tactics:  Criminals continuously adapt their methods, such as using automated transactions and pattern obfuscation, forcing financial institutions to constantly update their monitoring systems to detect emerging risks.
  • Dynamic and Expansive Regimes:  Sanctions are no longer limited to a small group of high-profile individuals but encompass entire sectors and regions, with frequent updates to lists requiring continuous, real-time screening.
  • Secondary Sanctions and Indirect Risk:  The growing use of secondary sanctions means firms face risks even if their direct client is not sanctioned, requiring enhanced due diligence across entire transaction chains and counterparties.
  • Geopolitical Fragmentation:  Diverging national approaches to sanctions and the use of economic tools beyond traditional sanctions (e.g., export controls, supply chain restrictions) create a complex, unpredictable regulatory landscape for global institutions.
  • Dynamic Status and Data Quality:  An individual's PEP status can change rapidly (e.g., an election cycle), and accessing accurate, up-to-date information, particularly from less transparent jurisdictions, remains a significant hurdle.
  • Inconsistent Definitions:  The lack of a universally accepted definition of a PEP, with criteria varying significantly by jurisdiction, complicates compliance for institutions operating internationally.
  • Identifying Relatives and Close Associates (RCAs):  Accurately identifying and monitoring the complex, often obscured, relationships of PEPs with their relatives and close associates is challenging, exposing institutions to risk through incomplete data.
  • Managing False Positives:  PEP databases are large, and name matching can result in a high rate of false positives, necessitating manual investigation and diverting resources.

Ready to secure your Financial Institutions operations? Start with the control under the most strain.

Talk to a practitioner
02

Brokerage Firms

Tailored Financial Crime & Regulatory compliance solutions for Brokerage Firms to prevent and detect financial crime and comply with prevailing laws and regulations.

Where the pressure sits

  • To effectively mitigate the risk of below mentioned challenges and non… To effectively mitigate the risk of below mentioned challenges and non-compliance with regulatory requirements and evolving risks of Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing, Proliferation Financing, Fraud and other forms of financial crime — and to avoid potential fines, penalties, and reputational damage — institutions require a comprehensive solutions and advisories. 
  • Sophisticated Identity Fraud: The proliferation of generative AI for d… Sophisticated Identity Fraud: The proliferation of generative AI for deepfakes and high-quality synthetic IDs poses a major threat to remote onboarding processes. Brokerage firms will need to move beyond traditional checks to implement robust identity verification solutions, including biometric checks, chip reading, and liveness testing.
  • Balancing Speed and Due Diligence: Firms face pressure to provide a se… Balancing Speed and Due Diligence: Firms face pressure to provide a seamless, fast digital onboarding experience to meet customer expectations, while simultaneously conducting complex, multi-layered due diligence, especially for high-risk clients or those with complex ownership structures.
  • Source of Wealth (SOW) Verification for Digital Assets: As clients inc… Source of Wealth (SOW) Verification for Digital Assets: As clients increasingly use proceeds from crypto-assets to purchase traditional assets, regulators expect firms to look "behind the transfer" and verify the source of the digital wealth, which can be challenging due to the potential use of privacy tools or mixers.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny of Onboarding Processes: Regulators like the FCA a… Regulatory Scrutiny of Onboarding Processes: Regulators like the FCA are intensifying their focus on firms' risk assessment processes, requiring meticulous documentation of why certain decisions were made, particularly when dealing with potential risks. 
  • Evolving Criminal Tactics and Alert Fatigue: Criminals continuously de… Evolving Criminal Tactics and Alert Fatigue: Criminals continuously develop new ways to launder money through markets (MLTM). Traditional rule-based monitoring systems are struggling to keep pace, leading to high rates of false positives that drain compliance teams' resources.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Complex Instruments: The shift to real-time p… Real-time Monitoring and Complex Instruments: The shift to real-time payment systems and the growth of complex, illiquid, or novel financial products (including tokenized assets) demand more sophisticated, real-time monitoring capabilities that many legacy systems lack.
  • Data Integration and Quality Issues: Monitoring transactions effective… Data Integration and Quality Issues: Monitoring transactions effectively requires consolidating vast amounts of data from various internal systems and third parties. Poor data quality and siloed systems can impede effective risk assessment and anomaly detection.
  • Monitoring AI-Driven Trading: The use of AI agents in trading function… Monitoring AI-Driven Trading: The use of AI agents in trading functions will require robust internal policies and monitoring to ensure that algorithmic advice and trading activities are consistent with regulatory obligations and free from bias or market manipulation risks. 
  • Dynamic and Expansive Sanctions Regimes: The geopolitical landscape is… Dynamic and Expansive Sanctions Regimes: The geopolitical landscape is volatile, leading to frequently updated and expansive sanctions lists that require continuous, real-time screening across the entire customer relationship lifecycle.
  • Indirect Risk and Supply Chain Scrutiny: Brokerage firms must navigate… Indirect Risk and Supply Chain Scrutiny: Brokerage firms must navigate the complexities of secondary sanctions and indirect risk, ensuring that their counterparties and even the underlying supply chains of traded goods are not in violation of restrictions.
  • Data Accuracy and Screening Efficiency: Ensuring that sanctions screen… Data Accuracy and Screening Efficiency: Ensuring that sanctions screening software uses advanced matching algorithms and up-to-date, comprehensive databases to minimize false positives while identifying genuine risks remains a significant operational challenge. 
  • Identifying RCAs and Data Quality: Accurately identifying PEPs and the… Identifying RCAs and Data Quality: Accurately identifying PEPs and their intricate networks of Relatives and Close Associates (RCAs), especially across different jurisdictions with varying transparency levels, is a major hurdle.
  • Inconsistent Regulatory Definitions: The lack of a harmonized global d… Inconsistent Regulatory Definitions: The lack of a harmonized global definition of a PEP, and the varying domestic guidance on how to treat them (e.g., the FCA's guidance on UK domestic PEPs), complicates cross-border compliance for international firms.
  • Avoiding "De-risking" Concerns: Regulators are increasingly focused on… Avoiding "De-risking" Concerns: Regulators are increasingly focused on preventing the unfair or discriminatory treatment of PEPs. Firms must apply a proportionate, risk-based approach without simply "de-risking" and refusing service, which requires a nuanced understanding and management of associated risks. 
  • At TitanAxe, we provide end-to-end Onboarding, Risk Assessment, Screen… At TitanAxe, we provide end-to-end Onboarding, Risk Assessment, Screening, Due Diligence, Monitoring and Risk Solutions & Financial Crime and Regulatory Compliance Advisories to overcome these challenges and to comply with prevailing Laws and Regulations of the Jurisdictions in which they operate.

Ready to secure your Brokerage Firms operations? Start with the control under the most strain.

Talk to a practitioner
03

Non-Banking Financial Institutions (NBFIs)

We provide Financial Crime & Regulatory compliance solutions for NBFIs to prevent and detect financial crime and comply with prevailing laws and regulations.

  • Asset Management Companies
  • Mutual Funds and Investment Plans
  • Pension Funds
  • Modarabas
  • Money Services Businesses

Where the pressure sits

  • High Volume and Velocity:  NBFCs, particularly MSBs, process a vast number of low-value, cross-border transactions for a diverse customer base, demanding rapid, scalable, and cost-effective onboarding processes.
  • Identity Fraud:  The increasing use of generative AI for deepfakes and high-quality synthetic IDs poses a significant threat to remote onboarding. Firms need advanced biometric verification and liveness testing to ensure the customer is who they claim to be.
  • Balancing Speed and Compliance:  The need for rapid service delivery to remain competitive often conflicts with rigorous regulatory demands for thorough Know Your Customer (KYC) and Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) identification.
  • Digital Asset Verification:  As digital assets become more mainstream, regulators expect NBFCs to verify the source of wealth when clients fund accounts with cryptocurrency, which is a new and complex process for many firms.
  • High Alert Volumes:  Rule-based transaction monitoring systems generate an overwhelming number of false positives due to the high volume and inherent nature of cross-border MSB transactions, leading to "alert fatigue" among compliance staff.
  • Real-time Cross-Border Complexity:  Monitoring transactions in real-time across multiple jurisdictions, currencies, and payment rails is a significant challenge, particularly with the proliferation of instant payment schemes that reduce the time available for intervention.
  • Evolving Criminal Typologies:  Criminals constantly adapt their methods, such as using micro-laundering techniques or exploiting new payment channels, requiring continuous updates to monitoring systems.
  • Data Integration and Quality:  Effective monitoring requires integrating data from disparate systems, which is challenging for firms with siloed or legacy technology infrastructure.
  • Dynamic and Expansive Regimes:  Geopolitical volatility results in frequently updated and expansive sanctions lists. NBFCs must ensure continuous, real-time screening to avoid violations as lists change rapidly.
  • Indirect Risk Exposure:  Firms must go beyond direct clients to identify potential indirect exposure through counterparties or supply chains, which is complex and requires robust data management and screening capabilities.
  • Operational Burden:  The sheer volume of transactions means that even a small percentage of false positives can create a massive manual review burden, consuming significant resources.
  • Identifying RCAs:  A major hurdle is accurately identifying the complex and often deliberately obscured networks of Relatives and Close Associates (RCAs) of PEPs.
  • Data Accuracy and Consistency:  Maintaining up-to-date and accurate PEP data across different jurisdictions is a challenge, as an individual's PEP status can change rapidly (e.g., due to elections or job changes).
  • Inconsistent Regulatory Approach:  The lack of a single, global definition of a PEP means NBFCs operating internationally must navigate varying domestic requirements and guidance, complicating compliance procedures.

Ready to secure your Non-Banking Financial Institutions (NBFIs) operations? Start with the control under the most strain.

Talk to a practitioner
04

Designated Non-Financial Businesses & Professions (DNFBPs)

Financial Crime & Regulatory compliance solutions for DNFBPs to prevent and detect financial crime and comply with prevailing laws and regulations.

  • Real estate agents
  • Dealers in precious metals and precious stones
  • Accountants providing specific services on behalf of clients
  • Trust and company service providers handling client-related duties

Where the pressure sits

  • Complex Ownership Structures:  DNFBPs, such as lawyers and real estate agents, are often used to create complex corporate structures or use shell companies, making it extremely difficult to identify the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) during onboarding.
  • Sophisticated Identity Fraud:  The rise of AI-generated deepfakes and high-quality fake documents means that traditional ID checks (e.g., a simple video call and passport scan) are no longer sufficient. Firms will need to invest in robust identity verification solutions, including biometric checks and liveness testing.
  • Balancing Confidentiality and Compliance:  Professionals like lawyers face the unique challenge of balancing client confidentiality rules with the regulatory obligation to conduct thorough due diligence and file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).
  • Verifying Digital Asset SOW:  Regulators increasingly expect DNFBPs to verify the source of wealth when clients use proceeds from crypto-assets for large purchases (e.g., real estate). This requires firms to obtain and interpret transaction histories and wallet records, a task for which many are unprepared.
  • Lack of Ongoing Monitoring Culture:  Many DNFBPs historically treated AML as a one-off, "tick-box" exercise during client acceptance. Cultivating a culture of continuous, risk-based monitoring throughout the client lifecycle is a significant shift in mindset and operations.
  • Nature of Transactions:  DNFBPs often deal with high-value, one-off transactions (like property sales or art auctions) rather than a high volume of small transactions, making it harder to establish "normal" activity patterns and detect anomalies in real-time.
  • Limited Technology and Expertise:  Many smaller DNFBP firms lack the sophisticated tools and skilled professionals required to manage and analyze the data volume needed for effective transaction monitoring, leading to potential gaps in coverage.
  • Dynamic and Fragmented Lists:  Sanctions lists are updated frequently due to geopolitical volatility. Firms must ensure their screening systems are constantly updated in real-time to avoid screening against outdated or incomplete data, a particular concern with the 2026 migration to the sole UK Sanctions List.
  • Identifying Indirect Exposure:  The complexity of global ownership structures makes it difficult to determine indirect sanctions exposure. Firms must screen beyond the immediate client to identify links to sanctioned entities, which is time-consuming and challenging without reliable data.
  • False Positives and Operational Burden:  Name similarities can generate numerous false positives, requiring manual investigation and diverting already limited compliance resources from genuine risks.
  • Data Quality and Management:  Maintaining accurate, up-to-date data on PEP status is a major challenge due to the dynamic nature of political roles and the global scope of operations.
  • Identifying Relatives and Close Associates (RCAs):  The greatest challenge is often not identifying the PEP themselves, but their extended network of relatives and close associates, whose connections may be obscured or deliberately hidden.
  • Inconsistent Definitions:  The lack of a uniform international definition of a PEP, and the varying domestic guidance on required due diligence, create a complex compliance landscape for DNFBPs operating across borders.

Ready to secure your Designated Non-Financial Businesses & Professions (DNFBPs) operations? Start with the control under the most strain.

Talk to a practitioner

Regulatory map

One framework, four supervisory realities.

Groups operating in more than one market end up running parallel programmes because each supervisor asks a different question. Titan holds one control set and reports it in the shape each regulator expects.

MarketWho supervisesWhat they press on
United States FinCEN and OFAC, under the Bank Secrecy Act Sanctions exposure, SAR timeliness and quality, and whether the AML programme was reasonably designed for the firm's actual risk.
United Kingdom FCA, HMRC and OFSI, under the Money Laundering Regulations Risk assessment quality, senior management accountability, and evidence that controls were tested rather than merely written.
European Union National supervisors moving under the AML Authority and the single rulebook Consistency across member states, beneficial ownership evidence, and harmonised customer due diligence standards.
Saudi Arabia and the Gulf SAMA and national financial intelligence units Local data expectations, sanctions alignment and demonstrable governance over outsourced functions.
Global baseline FATF Recommendations and mutual evaluation outcomes Risk based approach applied in practice, with grey list exposure feeding country risk decisions.

This is a summary for orientation. It is not legal advice, and obligations depend on your permissions and footprint.

How we start

Begin with one control. Connect the rest when you are ready.

All fifteen modules run on their own or connected as a single suite. Nobody has to replace a working programme to fix the part that is failing.

STEP 01

Diagnose

A Compliance Health Check maps what you have against what your supervisor expects, and names the gap that matters most. No product pitch until that is on paper.

STEP 02

Deploy one module

Usually the control under the most strain. Screening if false positives are drowning the team, onboarding if applications are dropping out, monitoring if the queue is behind.

STEP 03

Connect the record

As modules are added they share one customer record, one workflow engine and one audit trail, so the evidence trail builds itself instead of being assembled before an inspection.

Common questions

Before you get in touch.

Do we have to buy the whole platform? +

No. All fifteen Titan modules run on their own or connected as one suite. Most firms start with the single control that is under the most pressure and add modules as the programme matures.

Which module should we start with? +

It depends on where the pressure sits. Firms with an alert backlog usually start with TitanMonitoring. Firms losing applicants at signup start with TitanOnboarding. Firms preparing for an inspection start with TitanRisk and TitanAssurance.

Can you support more than one jurisdiction? +

Yes. Screening covers more than 150 jurisdictions and TitanRadar holds country risk data for more than 195 countries, so a group can run one framework and still reflect local rules and local supervisory expectations.

Is this workable for a small compliance team? +

Yes. Many DNFBPs and smaller NBFIs run compliance with one or two people. Modules deploy individually, and our outsourcing service can supply experienced practitioners alongside the technology when capacity is the real constraint.

Our sector is not listed. Can you still help? +

The platform is built around controls rather than sector labels, so it adapts to any regulated organisation and to firms choosing to hold themselves to the same standard. Tell us your obligations and we will map the modules to them.

Not seeing your sector?

Tell us what you are supervised against. We will map the controls.

Financial crime obligations do not stop at the sectors above. If you are regulated, preparing to be regulated, or holding yourself to the standard voluntarily, we will show you which modules apply and which you can leave for later.

Request a Demo Explore the Platform