Self guided tour
Look inside first. Book the call afterwards.
You should not have to sit through forty minutes of slides to find out whether a compliance tool fits how you work. This is the platform walked through in five steps, following one customer from a screening hit all the way to the evidence pack. No form, no gate.
Takes about four minutes. Nothing is collected while you browse.
- Length
- Five steps, about four minutes
- What it follows
- One customer, end to end
- Modules shown
- Six of the 5
- What we ask for
- Nothing at all
The tour
One customer, five steps.
Meridian Trade Partners Ltd applies to open an account. Here is what happens inside the platform between that application and the day a supervisor asks about it.
A name goes in. Scored matches come back.
Screening is easy to do badly. Match too loosely and the team drowns. Match too tightly and you miss the one that mattered. Every match arrives with a score, the list it came from and the version of that list on the day.
Screening results
Run 14:22 · Lists current as of today| Match | Source | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meridian Trading Partners Entity · Cyprus |
OFAC SDN | 82 | Open |
| A. Meridian Individual · PEP |
PEP register | 34 | Discounted |
| Meridian Ltd Entity · adverse media |
Adverse media | 21 | Discounted |
Why this matters. The two discounted matches are not deleted. The reason they were discounted, and who discounted them, stays on the file. That is the part firms cannot reproduce when a supervisor asks about a name two years later.
The company is not the customer. The people behind it are.
Corporate onboarding falls apart in the ownership chain. TitanOnboarding maps it, works out where the twenty five percent threshold is crossed, and screens the natural persons it finds rather than only the entity on the application form.
Ownership structure
Verified against registry filingsNext actions
Why this matters. Finding a PEP at the third level does not just raise a flag. It changes the customer's risk rating, triggers enhanced due diligence and shortens the review cycle, without an analyst remembering to do any of those three things.
An alert with nobody's name on it is not being worked.
Detection is the easy half. The half that fails an inspection is what happened next. Every alert becomes a case with an owner, a deadline and a decision, and the clock is visible before it runs out rather than afterwards.
Rapid movement through a new account
Rule TM-118 · Layering typology| Date | Counterparty | Amount | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02 Aug | Aurora Freight SA | GBP 148,000 | New payee |
| 02 Aug | Onward transfer | GBP 146,200 | Pass through |
| 03 Aug | Aurora Freight SA | GBP 151,500 | Repeat |
| 03 Aug | Onward transfer | GBP 149,900 | Pass through |
Case
Why this matters. The case is linked to the onboarding file and the screening run from the first two steps. The analyst is not opening four systems to work out whether this pattern is surprising for this customer.
A risk assessment nobody tests is an opinion.
TitanRisk holds the enterprise view across customers, products, channels and geographies. TitanAssurance holds the testing that proves the controls named in it are actually working, with the findings and remediation attached.
Residual risk by product and geography
Inherent risk less control effectivenessControl testing
Why this matters. The two high residual cells are high because testing found the controls behind them weak, not because somebody scored a spreadsheet by instinct. That distinction is the whole conversation in a supervisory meeting.
The pack you would have spent a week assembling.
Nothing in this step is new work. Everything in it was recorded while the previous four steps happened. That is the difference between a platform that records decisions and a set of tools that store outputs.
Decision history
Immutable · exportable as PDF or CSV- Screening run, three matches returned01.08 14:22 · SYSTEM · OFAC SDN v2026.08.01
- Two matches discounted with rationale recorded01.08 15:07 · N. ADEYEMI · ANALYST
- Ownership chain verified, PEP identified at level three01.08 16:40 · N. ADEYEMI · REGISTRY FILING
- Enhanced due diligence triggered automatically01.08 16:40 · SYSTEM · POLICY RULE EDD-04
- Alert 4471 raised, layering typology03.08 09:14 · SYSTEM · RULE TM-118
- Case reviewed and escalated to MLRO04.08 11:26 · N. ADEYEMI · FOUR EYES
- SAR drafted and approved05.08 10:02 · S. FAIZAN · MLRO
Regulatory pack
Why this matters. Every line names a person or a rule, a timestamp, and the version of the data used. When somebody asks why you did not act sooner, this is the answer, and it took nobody a week to produce.
What you just saw
Six modules. One thread.
TitanScan, TitanOnboarding, TitanMonitoring and TitanAssurance all appeared in that walkthrough, and at no point did anyone re key a customer name or open a second system to answer a question.
That thread is the product. Each module is useful on its own, and 1 more sit alongside them, but the reason firms consolidate is the line running from the first screening hit to the last audit entry.
Where to go next
Three ways to take this further.
Pick whichever matches how much of your time this is worth right now.
A live demo on your problem
Bring the control that is causing you trouble. We run the session on that rather than on a script, and tell you plainly if we do not cover it.
Book a demo → FIVE MINUTESThe version for your sector
The same platform, mapped to the risks and the supervisor you actually answer to, whether that is a payments firm or an estate agency.
Choose your sector → READ FIRSTHow we think about this
Written by the people who built it, on alert quality, evidence trails and what supervisors are actually asking for this year.
Open the knowledge hub →Seen enough
Have the conversation with someone who has done the job.
Our product team has held the MLRO seat, answered to a regulator and cleared a backlog at the end of a long week. You will not be handed to a script reader.